Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Jacob McKinley Dominey pled guilty to evading arrest or detention by using a vehicle. On November 1, 2004, the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Dominey guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Dominey on community supervision for five years, assessed a fine of $1000, and ordered Dominey to serve 180 days in a state jail facility as a condition of community supervision. On May 2, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Dominey's unadjudicated community supervision. Dominey pled "true" to four violations of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Dominey violated the conditions of his community supervision, found Dominey guilty of evading arrest or detention by using a vehicle, and assessed punishment at two years of confinement in a state jail facility.

Dominey's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On April 12, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. ⁽¹⁾

AFFIRMED.

_________________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on August 21, 2007

Opinion Delivered September 5, 2007

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.