Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Luke Wade Armentor pleaded no contest to aggravated robbery. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Armentor guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Armentor on community supervision for ten years, assessed a fine of $1000, and ordered Armentor to enter and successfully complete the sheriff's office boot camp. On August 21, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Armentor's unadjudicated community supervision. Armentor pleaded "true" to one of the alleged violations and "not true" to the other. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Armentor violated one of the conditions of his community supervision, found Armentor guilty of aggravated robbery, and assessed punishment at fifty years of confinement.

Armentor's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. ⁽¹⁾

AFFIRMED.

________________________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Submitted on April 6, 2007

Opinion Delivered April 18, 2007

Do not publish

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.