Pursuant to plea bargains, appellant Perry Thomas pled guilty to robbery in three separate proceedings before the trial court. In each case, the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Thomas guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Thomas on community supervision for ten years, and assessed a fine of $500.00. In all three cases, the State filed motions to revoke Thomas's unadjudicated community supervision. Thomas pled "true" to violating the terms of the community supervision orders in each case. In all three cases, the trial court found that Thomas violated the terms of the community supervision order, adjudicated Thomas guilty of robbery, ordered Thomas to pay restitution, and imposed a sentence of twenty years of confinement.

Thomas's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the records and concludes the appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We have reviewed the appellate record in each case, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeals. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeals. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgments. ⁽¹⁾

AFFIRMED.

_______________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on February 13, 2007

Opinion Delivered February 28, 2007

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in these cases by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.