Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Lon Clarke Ruckel v. Deborah Deniese Ruckel

Lon Clarke Ruckel v. Deborah Deniese Ruckel
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 8, 2007

Lon Clarke Ruckel v. Deborah Deniese Ruckel

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________



NO. 09-06-033 CV

____________________



LON CLARKE RUCKEL, Appellant



V.



DEBORAH DENIESE RUCKEL, Appellee




On Appeal from the 1-A District Court

Jasper County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20971




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Lon Clarke Ruckel appealed an order denying his motion to clarify a qualified domestic relations order and ordering him to pay attorney's fees to the opposing party, Deborah Deniese Ruckel Yates. The appeal was submitted without briefs because the appellant failed to file his brief by September 20, 2006, the due date on the final extension granted for filing a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a), (d). On January 11, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.9. In the absence of a brief assigning error, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

APPEAL DISMISSED.







_______________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice







Submitted on February 1, 2007

Opinion Delivered February 8, 2007



Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.