Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Leisa Lou Harris Adams and Aaron Lane Adams v. Cheryl Harris, Individually and as Independent Co-Executor of the Estate of John Barron Harris

Leisa Lou Harris Adams and Aaron Lane Adams v. Cheryl Harris, Individually and as Independent Co-Executor of the Estate of John Barron Harris
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 13, 2007

Leisa Lou Harris Adams and Aaron Lane Adams v. Cheryl Harris, Individually and as Independent Co-Executor of the Estate of John Barron Harris

Opinion

 

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-06-00358-CV

 

Leisa Lou Harris Adams and

Aaron Lane Adams,

                                                                                    Appellants

 v.

 

Cheryl Harris, Individually and

as Independent Co-Executor of the

Estate of John Barron Harris,

Deceased,

                                                                                    Appellee

 

 


From the 220th District Court

Hamilton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04-01-01604

 

MEMORANDUM  Opinion


 

            Appellants Leisa Lou Harris Adams and Aaron Lane Adams filed a notice of appeal from a judgment rendered against them.  They have now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating the parties have reached a settlement of their controversy.


            This appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

 

                                                                                    TOM GRAY

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Before Chief Justice Gray,

            Justice Vance, and

            Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 13, 2007

[CV06]

draws his or her notice of appeal. The appellant and his or her attorney must sign the written withdrawal and file it in duplicate with the appellate clerk. . . .


Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).


      We have not issued a decision in this appeal. The motion is signed by both Easley and her attorney. Thus, the motion meets the requirements of the rules and is granted.

      Easley’s appeal is dismissed.

                                                                                           PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

            Justice Cummings, and

            Justice Vance

Dismissed on appellant’s motion

Order issued and filed September 9, 1998

Do not publish    

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.