Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Rebecca Nitsche and Connie Poehl v. Assemblage of Praise Church

Rebecca Nitsche and Connie Poehl v. Assemblage of Praise Church
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 30, 2007

Rebecca Nitsche and Connie Poehl v. Assemblage of Praise Church

Opinion

 

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-07-00029-CV

 

Rebecca Nitsche and Connie Poehl,

                                                                                    Appellant

 v.

 

Assemblage of Praise Church,

                                                                                    Appellee

 

 


From the County Court at Law No. 2

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 05-003489-CV-CCL2

 

MEMORANDUM  Opinion

 

            On different dates, Rebecca Nitsche and Connie Poehl filed separate pro se notices of appeal from an adverse judgment rendered against each of them.  Only Nitsche has paid the filing fee for her appeal.  Neither Nitsche nor Poehl have filed docketing statements.  The Clerk of the Court notified Poehl by letter that her filing fee was past due and that her docketing statement was past due.  The Clerk of the Court notified Nitsche by letter that her docketing statement was past due.  Each appellant was warned that if these deficiencies were not corrected within 14 days, the appeal would be submitted to the Court for dismissal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (b), (c).

            The Clerk also informed both Nitsche and Poehl by letter that if they were pursuing a joint appeal, then they need only notify the Court in writing of such and present a completed joint docketing statement and pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee and notify this Court of the actions taken within 14 days from the date of the letter.  Otherwise, the Clerk warned, the appeal as a whole would be presented to the Court for dismissal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

            More than 14 days have passed and neither Nitsche nor Poehl have responded.  A clerk’s record has been filed, but we do not know if either appellant paid for that record.

            This appeal is dismissed.

                                                                                    TOM GRAY

                                                                                    Chief Justice

 

Before Chief Justice Gray,

            Justice Vance, and

            Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 30, 2007

[CV06]


 

388889in">      Sicurella's appeal is dismissed.

                                                                               PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Thomas,

      Justice Cummings, and

      Justice Vance

Dismissed on appellant's motion

Opinion delivered and filed November 8, 1995

Do not publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.