Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Preston Harris v. State of Texas

Preston Harris v. State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 25, 2007

Preston Harris v. State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion filed October 25, 2007

 

 

Opinion filed October 25, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                        In The

                                                                             

    Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                 ____________

 

                                                          No. 11-07-00267-CR

                                                    __________

 

                                      PRESTON HARRIS, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                                        STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                         On Appeal from the 118th District Court

 

                                                         Howard County, Texas

 

                                                    Trial Court Cause No. 11359

 

 

                                                                   O P I N I O N

Preston Harris was convicted of injury to an elderly individual, and his punishment was assessed at confinement for ninety-nine years.  The trial court imposed the sentence in open court on May 8, 2007.  On September 5, 2007, appellant filed both a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


On September 24, 2007, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that it appeared an appeal had not been timely perfected and requesting that appellant respond on or before October 9, 2007, showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Counsel has responded by forwarding a copy of the August 30, 2007 letter appointing him as appellate counsel and by advising this court that appellant has been moved from the Howard County Jail and that counsel is trying to contact appellant.

We note that counsel was not appointed until after the deadline for filing a motion for new trial or the deadline for filing a notice of appeal absent a motion for new trial.  Absent a timely notice of appeal or compliance with Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).  Appellant may be able to secure an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 

PER CURIAM

 

October 25, 2007

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.