Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Luciano Sarabosing, Jr., M.D., P.A. v. Children's Center of Victoria, L.L.P.

Luciano Sarabosing, Jr., M.D., P.A. v. Children's Center of Victoria, L.L.P.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 20, 2007

Luciano Sarabosing, Jr., M.D., P.A. v. Children's Center of Victoria, L.L.P.

Opinion











NUMBER 13-07-487-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________



LUCIANO SARABOSING, JR., M.D., P.A., Appellant,



v.


CHILDREN'S CENTER OF VICTORIA, L.L.P., ET AL., Appellees.

______________________________________________________ _



On appeal from the 267th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, LUCIANO SARABOSING, JR., M.D., P.A., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause no. 06-4-64,203-A. The clerk's record was received on August 7, 2007.

Upon review of the clerk's record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant's response to this Court's notice was received on August 29, 2007. In his response, appellant states that this Court is correct in that the order from which the appeal was taken is not a final appealable order and that the defect cannot be cured at this time. Appellant states that there will be no appeal filed or pursued at this time.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellant's response, and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 20th day of September, 2007.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.