Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal

Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 24, 2007

Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal

Opinion









NUMBER13-06-019-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________



PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK OF DELAWARE, INC.

AND PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE AND JACK OF

CALIFORNIA, Appellants,



v.


ARMANDO LEAL, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________



On appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK OF DELAWARE, INC. AND PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE AND JACK OF CALIFORNIA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1325-05-A. On January 3, 2007, this Court was notified that the above cause had settled and that a formal motion to dispose of the case would be filed.

On April 24, 2007, no motion or communication having been received from the parties, this Court requested that the parties either file an appropriate motion to dispose of the case or advise the Court of the status of the matter. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice was given that, if no response was received within ten days from the date of receipt of said notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellants' failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 24th day of May, 2007





Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.