Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

in the Interest of J. M. S., Etal., Children

in the Interest of J. M. S., Etal., Children
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 29, 2007

in the Interest of J. M. S., Etal., Children

Opinion









NUMBER 13-06-147-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________



IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.S., ET AL., CHILDREN

________________________________________________________



On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Kleberg County, Texas

________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Vera Shoemaker, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 04-044-C. On June 14, 2006, appellant filed a motion for new trial based on an incomplete record. On November 2, 2006, this Court abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to make findings on these issues: 1) if, without the appellant's fault, a significant portion of the court reporter's notes and records have been lost or destroyed or - if the proceedings were electronically recorded - a significant portion of the recording has been lost or destroyed or is inaudible; 2) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record is necessary to the appeal's resolution; and 3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties.

The trial court's findings and recommendations were received and filed in this Court on December 18, 2006. The trial court found that approximately one-half of the record was audible, the latter half of the proceeding was not complete and audible, and that the incomplete and inaudible portion of the record constituted a significant portion of the record, which cannot be reconstructed. The trial court recommended that because of the unavailability of a significant portion of the record, the case should be remanded for a new hearing.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the trial court's findings and recommendations, is of the opinion that the matter should be remanded for a new trial. Appellant's motion for a new trial based on an incomplete record is granted. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED for a new trial.

PER CURIAM





Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 29th day of March, 2007.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.