Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2007

Lambert's Trash Hauling, Inc. and Paul C. Lambert v. Financial Federal Credit, Inc.

Lambert's Trash Hauling, Inc. and Paul C. Lambert v. Financial Federal Credit, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 30, 2007

Lambert's Trash Hauling, Inc. and Paul C. Lambert v. Financial Federal Credit, Inc.

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2007.

 

 

 

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

 

NO. 14-07-00419-CV

____________

 

LAMBERT=S TRASH HAULING, INC. and PAUL C. LAMBERT, Appellants

 

V.

 

FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT, INC., Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 849838

 

 

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a default judgment signed April 11, 2006.  Appellant filed an untimely motion to set aside the judgment on March 14, 2007.  Appellant=s notice of appeal was filed May 14, 2007.

The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1


Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time.  See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 9 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26).  However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617-18.  Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3

On July 30, 2007, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant filed no response to the motion.  We grant appellee=s motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Guzman.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.