in Re: Woody K. Lesikar, as Trustee of the Woodrow v. Lesikar Family Trust of...
in Re: Woody K. Lesikar, as Trustee of the Woodrow v. Lesikar Family Trust of...
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00780-CV
____________
IN RE WOODY K. LESIKAR, AS TRUSTEE OF THE WOODROW V. LESIKAR FAMILY TRUST, TRUSTEE OF THE WOODY K. LESIKAR SPECIAL TRUST,
AND INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
WOODROW V. LESIKAR, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On September 12, 2006, relator Woody K. Lesikar, as Trustee of the Woodrow V. Lesikar Family Trust, the Woody K. Lesikar Special Trust, and as Independent Executor of the Estate of Woodrow V. Lesikar, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, requesting we compel the Honorable Richard May, judge of the 149th District Court, Brazoria County, Texas, to grant relator=s request for a finding under section 52.0011(a)(2) of the Texas Property Code or, in other words, a finding that the abstract of judgment filed by real party in interest[1] is not a lien on relator=s property.[2] See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. ' 52.0011(a)(2) (Vernon 1995).
We conclude that relator has failed to establish he is entitled to the requested mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 25, 2007.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Hudson, and Guzman.
[1]Carolyn Ann Lesikar Moon, individually and as named trustee of the Carolyn Ann Lesikar Moon Special Trust, is the real party in interest.
[2]See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.