Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Danny Lee Harris v. State

Danny Lee Harris v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 2, 2008

Danny Lee Harris v. State

Opinion

Opinion issued October 2, 2008





















In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas




NOS. 01-07-01081-CR

01-07-01082-CR




DANNY LEE HARRIS, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1087357 and 1087358




MEMORANDUM OPINION



A jury found appellant, Danny Lee Harris, guilty of two separate offenses of aggravated assault. The jury found true two enhancement paragraphs in each case and assessed punishment in both cases at confinement for 60 years. Appellant gave notice of appeal. We affirm.

Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record in presents no reversible error, that the appeals are without merit and are frivolous, and that the appeals must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W. 2d 807, 810 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

Counsel represents that he has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that these appeals are frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We affirm the judgments of the trial court and grant counsel's motions to withdraw. (1)

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Alcala.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

1. Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.