Opinion issued September 25, 2008

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NOS. 01-06-01081-CR

01-06-01082-CR

01-06-01083-CR

____________

DAMIAN REGINALD BLOW, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1041200, 1051712, 1051711

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Damian Reginald Blow, pleaded guilty to three separate felony offenses of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. After a presentence investigation hearing, the trial court sentenced appellant in each case to confinement for 10 years. We affirm.

Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the records present no reversible error, that the appeals are without merit and are frivolous, and that the appeals must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, (1967). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

Counsel represents that he has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We affirm the judgments of the trial court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. ⁽¹⁾

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

1.Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).