Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Richard Van Meurs and Rosina Van Meurs v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA

Richard Van Meurs and Rosina Van Meurs v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 10, 2008

Richard Van Meurs and Rosina Van Meurs v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA

Opinion

Opinion issued July 10, 2008









In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas





NO. 01-08-00163-CV





RICHARD VAN MEURS AND ROSINA VAN MEURS, Appellant


V.


WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, Appellee





On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-06263





MEMORANDUM OPINIONAppellants Richard Van Meurs and Rosina Van Meurs have neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207 (Vernon 2005), 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2007); 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants Richard Van Meurs and Rosina Van Meurs did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We deny all pending motions.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes and Higley.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.