Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Sherman T. Fontenot v. Maddox Landscaping and Lawn Co. D/B/A Maddox Landscaping and Lawn Care and Jose Santos Martinez

Sherman T. Fontenot v. Maddox Landscaping and Lawn Co. D/B/A Maddox Landscaping and Lawn Care and Jose Santos Martinez
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 22, 2008

Sherman T. Fontenot v. Maddox Landscaping and Lawn Co. D/B/A Maddox Landscaping and Lawn Care and Jose Santos Martinez

Opinion

Opinion issued May 22, 2008















In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas




NO. 01-08-00092-CV




SHERMAN T. FONTENOT, Appellant



V.



MADDOX LANDSCAPING AND LAWN CO. D/B/A MADDOX LANDSCAPING AND LAWN CARE AND JOSE SANTOS MARTINEZ, Appellees




On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Ford Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 06CV147067




MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Sherman T. Fontenot has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §§ 51.207 (Vernon 2005), 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2007); 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Sherman T. Fontenot did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We deny all pending motions.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Alcala, and Hanks.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.