Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.

Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 10, 2008

Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.

Opinion

Opinion issued April 10, 2008















In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-07-00275-CV

____________



JIMMY VAUGHAN D/B/A BOTANICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN, Appellant



V.



SIREN STEEL, INC., Appellee




On Appeal from the 113 th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-43991




MEMORANDUM OPINION

We received communication from the mediator on October 23, 2007, stating that the parties had settled. Because no motion to dismiss was filed, on February 19, 2008, the Court issued a notice warning that unless, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the parties to the appeal demonstrate that there was a live controversy between them as to the merits of this appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. See Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App. -Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ) (existence of actual controversy is essential to exercise of appellate jurisdiction). Appellant has filed no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Alcala.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.