in Re Mark Anthony Shilling
in Re Mark Anthony Shilling
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-08-373-CV
IN RE MARK ANTHONY SHILLING RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] ON REHEARING
------------
Upon consideration of relator=s motion for rehearing and Amotion for leave to file motion for explanation of motion to abate venue with probable cause in relators (sic) writ of mandamus,@ we deny the motions; however, we withdraw our opinion of September 29, 2008, and substitute the following in its place.
The court has considered relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.[2] Accordingly, relator=s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 12, 2008
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]Jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief from a final felony conviction rests exclusively with the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.