Bradford Taylor v. Dena Taylor
Bradford Taylor v. Dena Taylor
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-159-CV BRADFORD TAYLOR APPELLANT V. DENA TAYLOR APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ---------- On October 15, 2008, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
… See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 20, 2008
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.