Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Lonnie Wilson v. Sun Chemical Corporation

Lonnie Wilson v. Sun Chemical Corporation
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 10, 2008

Lonnie Wilson v. Sun Chemical Corporation

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-07-272-CV

LONNIE WILSON                                                                  APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION                                               APPELLEE

 

                                               ----------

             FROM THE 96th DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

On December 3, 2007, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.


Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

 

PER CURIAM              

 

 

PANEL D:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

 

DELIVERED:  January 10, 2008

 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.