In April 2007, appellant was placed on community supervision after being convicted on his plea of guilty to stalking. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 42.072 (West 2003). Five months later, the State filed a motion to revoke alleging that appellant violated the conditions of supervision by committing the offense of injury to a child. See id. § 22.04 (West Supp. 2008). Three months after that, appellant was also indicted for intentionally and knowingly causing bodily injury to a child, based on the same incident. The indictment and motion to revoke were tried together. A jury convicted appellant of the new offense and the trial court revoked supervision. The court imposed two six-year prison sentences, to be served concurrently.

The complainant, a fifth grader, testified that on the day in question, she got off the school bus and was walking home when a man in a car pulled up beside her and asked her if she wanted to buy some bread. When the complainant ignored the man and continued to walk toward her house, the man seized her arm and tried to pull her into the car. She identified appellant as the man who pulled her arm. The complainant's testimony was corroborated in whole or in part by other children who witnessed the incident, by the complainant's mother, and by mothers of the other children. A sheriff's deputy arrested appellant at the scene a short time after the incident.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a brief concluding that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction and order revoking community supervision are affirmed.

___________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: December 31, 2008

Do Not Publish