Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Texas State University - San Marcos v. Sam and Betty Bonnin, Individually, and as Independent, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Jason Lee Bonnin

Texas State University - San Marcos v. Sam and Betty Bonnin, Individually, and as Independent, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Jason Lee Bonnin
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 19, 2008

Texas State University - San Marcos v. Sam and Betty Bonnin, Individually, and as Independent, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Jason Lee Bonnin

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00177-CV

Gerald Wayne Inman, Appellant v. Sherry Ann Bryant, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 426TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 99,291-B, HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed an order awarding appellee Sherry Ann Bryan almost $30,000 in child support arrearages from appellant Gerald Wayne Inman. Appellant, representing himself pro se, timely filed a notice of appeal and affidavit of indigence on March 14, 2008. He filed a motion in this Court asking us to suspend the enforcement of the judgment and allow him to proceed without posting a supersedeas bond and a later motion again asking us to suspend the judgment and seeking an extension of time to pay his filing fees. We abated the appeal to allow the trial court to determine whether the judgment should be suspended and if so, under what conditions.

In July, the trial court held a hearing and denied appellant’s motion to suspend judgment pending appeal and found that appellant is not indigent.

Since filing his notice of appeal and motions to suspend judgment, appellant has apparently moved and has not provided this Court with a forwarding address. Our attempts to locate appellant have failed, and on October 17, 2008, after several fruitless attempts to contact appellant, we sent notice to appellant that his brief was overdue and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if appellant did not respond by October 27. To date, appellant has not responded to our notification. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: December 19, 2008

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.