Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Pate-Chen Investment, LLC and Dar-Sheng Chen v. Randy Patton

Pate-Chen Investment, LLC and Dar-Sheng Chen v. Randy Patton
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 28, 2008

Pate-Chen Investment, LLC and Dar-Sheng Chen v. Randy Patton

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






NO. 03-08-00082-CV


Pate-Chen Investment, LLC and Dar-Sheng Chen, Appellants

v.



Randy Patton, Appellee






FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2006-0778B, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING


M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N





Appellants have informed the Court that they no longer wish to pursue this appeal because the parties have "settled their dispute in its entirety." Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1 and 43.2(e), the parties have filed an agreed motion requesting the Court to vacate the trial court's judgment, dismiss the appeal, and order the release of appellants' supersedeas bond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(e); Young Materials Corp. v. Smith, 4 S.W.3d 84, 84-85 (Tex. App.--Waco 1999, no pet.) (appellate court may vacate trial court judgment and dismiss appeal upon parties' motion); American Habilitation Servs., Inc. v. Peterson, No. 01-07-00791-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 1800, at *1 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (appellate court may authorize release of supersedeas bond upon dismissal of appeal). We grant the parties' motion and hereby vacate the trial court's judgment, release the pending supersedeas bond to Kurt H. Kuhn, counsel for the appellants, and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(e).



__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Vacated and Cause Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: August 28, 2008

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.