Rodolfo Cipriano Gomez v. Glen R. Peterson
Rodolfo Cipriano Gomez v. Glen R. Peterson
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-07-00632-CV
Rodolfo Cipriano Gomez, Appellant v. Glen R. Peterson, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2007-0223C, HONORABLE RONALD G. CARR, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed his notice of appeal on November 6, 2007, and the clerk’s record was filed on December 7. Because appellant had not requested a reporter’s record, we sent appellant notice that he had until February 29, 2008, to either pay or make arrangements to pay for the record or file a motion to extend time to file his brief. On March 10, having received no response from appellant, we sent him notice that unless his brief was received by March 20, we would dismiss his appeal. To date, appellant has not responded to our communications. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: May 20, 2008
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.