Charlies W. Bishop II v. State
Charlies W. Bishop II v. State
Opinion
Charles Bishop, acting pro se, seeks to appeal an agreed order finding him incompetent to stand trial and committing him for further examination and treatment. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 46B.005 (West 2006). The order, signed November 9, 2007, reflects that Bishop is represented by counsel.
No interlocutory appeal may be taken from an order under article 46B.005. Id. art. 46B.011. The appeal is dismissed.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: March 14, 2008
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.