Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008

in Re Juan Chavez

in Re Juan Chavez
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided August 6, 2008
in Re Juan Chavez

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00433-CV

IN RE Juan CHAVEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 6, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 20, 2008, relator Juan Chavez filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court. Chavez, who was a candidate for a position on the Laredo City Council, was defeated in an election held on May 10, 2008. Chavez claims the winner of the election, Jose A. Valdez, Jr., was ineligible to run for the Laredo City Council. Chavez requests a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to reverse its order of March 13, 2008 declaring Valdez eligible to seek election to the city council and requiring Valdez’s name to be placed on the ballot. The court has considered Chavez’s mandamus petition and is of the opinion relief should be denied. See Cox v. Perry, 138 S.W.3d 515, 518 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, no pet.) (holding defeated candidate did not have standing to challenge winning candidate’s eligibility to take office); Norville v. Parnell, 118 S.W.3d 503, 504 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, pet. denied) (holding the issue of a winning candidate’s eligibility is exclusively a matter of public concern and must be prosecuted by the State in a writ of quo warranto).

Accordingly, Chavez’s petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CVQ-000288-D2, styled Jose A. Valdez, Jr. v. Gustavo Guevara, Jr., City Secretary, and the City of Laredo, filed in the 111th Judicial District Court, W ebb County, Texas. However, the challenged orders were signed by the Honorable David Peeples, Presiding Judge, Fourth Administrative Judicial Region, who heard the case by assignment.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.