Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Tommie Loyd Prater v. State

Tommie Loyd Prater v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 15, 2008

Tommie Loyd Prater v. State

Opinion

















In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________



No. 06-07-00193-CR

______________________________





TOMMIE LOYD PRATER, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee






On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22064










Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Tommie Loyd Prater has brought eight separate appeals (1) from eight jury convictions for various sexually related activities. In this appeal, from trial court number 22064, he was convicted of indecency with a child by sexual contact (J.A.P., a child under fourteen years of age) by touching her genitals on or about August 1, 2006. He was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine.

Upon reviewing the brief, we find one contention of error relevant to all convictions involving victim A.C.P., and two contentions of error relevant to the conviction involving victim T.L.P. There are no arguments or issues raised that are relevant to Prater's conviction in the instant case. Accordingly, with no allegation of error being shown in connection with this conviction, there is nothing for this Court to review.





We affirm the judgment.



Jack Carter

Justice



Date Submitted: August 8, 2008

Date Decided: September 15, 2008



Do Not Publish





1. Prater appeals from eight convictions. In cause number 06-07-00187-CR, he appeals from his conviction of indecency with a child (A.C.P.) by sexual contact; in cause numbers 06-07-00188-CR through 06-07-00192-CR, he appeals his convictions of sexual assault of a child (A.C.P.). In each of these cases, Prater was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment, to run consecutively, and $10,000.00 fines.

Prater appeals his conviction in cause number 06-07-00193-CR of indecency with a child (J.A.P.) by sexual contact. Prater was sentenced in this case to twenty years' imprisonment, to run consecutively, and a $10,000.00 fine.

Prater also appeals his conviction in cause number 06-07-00194-CR of aggravated sexual assault of a child (T.L.P.). He was sentenced to life imprisonment, to run consecutively, and a $10,000.00 fine.

ked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-10-00061-CV

                                                ______________________________

 

 

      HERBERT R. PUTZ AND E.T. AGSERVICES, COMPANY, Appellants

 

                                                                V.

 

                                           DAVID JACOBS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 62nd Judicial District Court

                                                              Delta County, Texas

                                                            Trial Court No. 10157

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            Appellants, Herbert Putz, and E.T. Agservices Company, have filed with this Court a motion to dismiss the pending appeal in this matter.  Appellants represent to this Court that the parties have reached a full and final settlement.  In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal is moot.

            We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

 

 

 

                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          August 10, 2010

Date Decided:             August 11, 2010

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.