Charles Whitley Mick appeals from his conviction by a jury for indecency with a child with J.H. The jury assessed his punishment at twenty years' imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine. ⁽¹⁾

On appeal, Mick contends that the trial court erred by admitting a video recording of an interview by a state worker with another alleged victim, M.M. ⁽²⁾ He argues that this error is reversible because it leaves grave doubt that his conviction was free from the substantial influence of the error.

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on his appeal in cause number 06-07-00004-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not been shown.

We affirm the judgment.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: May 30, 2008

Date Decided: June 2, 2008

Do Not Publish

1. Mick appeals from this and five other convictions. In cause number 06-07-00004-CR, he was convicted of aggravated sexual assault on M.M. and sentenced to forty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number 06-07-00005-CR, he was convicted of aggravated sexual assault on M.M. and sentenced to forty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number 06-07-00006-CR, he was convicted of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number 06-07-00007-CR, he was convicted of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number 06-07-00008-CR, he was convicted of one count of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent), and one count of aggravated sexual assault on a child with J.H. and sentenced to forty years' imprisonment (consecutive to 0618762 (06-07-00004-CR)). In cause number 06-07-00009-CR, Mick was convicted of one count of aggravated sexual assault on J.H. and sentenced to forty years' imprisonment (concurrent), and one count of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In each conviction, the jury also assessed a $10,000.00 fine against Mick.

2. Mick does not present a Confrontation Clause issue--M.M. testified at the trial.

0;                                                           Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice 

Date Submitted:          February 9, 2006

Date Decided:             February 10, 2006