Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Vicente Casas v. State

Vicente Casas v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 25, 2008

Vicente Casas v. State

Opinion

NO. 07-08-0297-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL B


NOVEMBER 25, 2008


______________________________



VICENTE CASAS, APPELLANT


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


_________________________________


FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;


NO. 2005-411,025; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING


_______________________________


Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

          Appellant, Vicente Casas, appeals his conviction for the offense of burglary of a habitation with intent to commit a felony and sentence of 50 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We abate for further proceedings.

          Appellant's brief was due to be filed no later than October 13, 2008, but has yet to be filed. Appellant’s attorney of record was notified by letter dated October 23 that unless a brief or motion was received by November 3rd, this court would abate the appeal to the trial court. On November 7, appellate counsel filed a motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief requesting until November 10 to file appellant’s almost completed brief. On November 13, appellant’s attorney was notified that his motion for extension was denied and that appellant’s brief was due on or before November 18. Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had further communication with this court.

          Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

          1.       whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

 

2.whether the trial court appointed counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal; and

 

3.whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel given the attorney’s failure to file a brief.


 

     The trial court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that appellant does want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel

shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by December 23, 2008.

          It is so ordered.

 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

obbed the store; appellant cites us to no evidence establishing that. And, unless established, it does not matter whether he had tattoos at trial. Second, tattoos may be indicative of gang involvement or prior imprisonment and either possibility is something which a lawyer may not care to share with a jury. In other words, what appellant deems neglect may have actually been reasonable trial strategy, which we cannot impugn.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.



Brian Quinn

Chief Justice



Do not publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.