Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Jesus Dominguez v. State

Jesus Dominguez v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 18, 2008

Jesus Dominguez v. State

Opinion

NO. 07-08-0094-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


AUGUST 18, 2008

______________________________


JESUS J. DOMINGUEZ, APPELLANT


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________


FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;


NO. 2001-435,924; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________



Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

          Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney have both signed the motion. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                                James T. Campbell

                                                                          Justice

Do not publish.

12pt">MARTHA C. FIELD AND J & J CATTLE FAMILY

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES

_________________________________


FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARTLEY COUNTY;


NO. 4300H; HONORABLE RONALD E. ENNS, JUDGE

_______________________________



Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.

ORDER

          On July 7, 2008, this Court heard oral argument of appellant Elizabeth C. Brent’s Second Motion to Review Security or Alternatively Reconsider June 17 Opinion. The Court notes that the trial court signed its “Order to Hartley County District Clerk to Disburse Funds” on June 18, 2008, ordering disbursement of funds held in its registry to, inter alia, Brent and appellee Martha C. Field. Field and Brent agree that on June 19 the trial court clerk issued checks to them and another party, Thomas & Watson Trucking, Inc. Funds also apparently were disbursed to Hartley County. The same day, this Court issued an order staying the trial court’s disbursement order. On July 2, we inter alia enjoined Field and Brent from “transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, and in any way dissipating” the funds disbursed from the registry of the court.

          The Court makes the following preliminary orders:

          Field, Brent, Thomas & Watson Trucking, Inc. and Hartley County are ordered to return to the Hartley County District Clerk, no later than 4:30 p.m., on Tuesday, July 8, 2008, all funds disbursed by that clerk under the trial court’s June 18 Order to Hartley County District Clerk to Disburse Funds;

          Diane Thompson, District and County Clerk of Hartley County, is ordered to deposit the funds in a fully insured, interest-bearing account, where they shall remain subject to the further order of the Seventh Court of Appeals;

          By 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 9, 2008, Diane Thompson shall report to the clerk of this Court: (1) the status of compliance with this order by Brent, Field, Thomas & Watson Trucking, Inc. and Hartley County; (2) the status of deposit of the funds by her office. Ms. Thompson’s report shall be in writing transmitted by facsimile, and by regular mail, with copies to counsel for Brent, Field and Thomas & Watson Trucking, Inc., and to the trial court.

          Relief requested in Brent’s Second Motion to Review Security or Alternatively Reconsider June 17 Opinion is neither granted nor denied but taken under advisement until further order this Court.

          It is so ordered.

 

Per Curiam

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.