in the Interest of S.L.P.
in the Interest of S.L.P.
Opinion
On June 2, 2008, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant did not respond. The appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Costs are assessed against the appellant.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
_____________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered July 17, 2008
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.