Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Russell Earl Gluyas v. State

Russell Earl Gluyas v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 11, 2008

Russell Earl Gluyas v. State

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-07-496 CR

____________________



RUSSELL EARL GLUYAS, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 06-05-04470-CR




MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Russell Earl Gluyas guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.021(a)(1)(B), (2)(B) (Vernon Supp. 2007). The trial court sentenced Gluyas to thirty years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

On appeal, Gluyas's counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On February 21, 2008, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)

AFFIRMED.

__________________________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice



Submitted on May 28, 2008

Opinion Delivered June 11, 2008

Do not publish



Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.