Timothy Alan Bailey v. State
Timothy Alan Bailey v. State
Opinion
On February 21, 2008, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal, and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. The appellant did not file a response. The State contests jurisdiction.
The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the trial court's order continuing appellant's community supervision and imposing additional conditions. The trial court's order is not appealable. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (Appellate court lacks jurisdiction on direct appeal from an order modifying the terms and conditions of probation.). Accordingly, we hold the order from which appellant appeals is not appealable. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
_______________________________
CHARLES A. KREGER
Justice
Opinion Delivered March 19, 2008
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.