Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Diane Krueger v. Shoukatali Dhanani, Gulshan Enterprises, Inc., Chevron USA, Inc. and Chevron Stations, Inc.

Diane Krueger v. Shoukatali Dhanani, Gulshan Enterprises, Inc., Chevron USA, Inc. and Chevron Stations, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 7, 2008

Diane Krueger v. Shoukatali Dhanani, Gulshan Enterprises, Inc., Chevron USA, Inc. and Chevron Stations, Inc.

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-07-254 CV

____________________





DIANE KRUEGER, Appellant



V.



SHOUKATALI DHANANI, GULSHAN ENTERPRISES, INC.,

CHEVRON USA, INC., AND CHEVRON STATIONS, INC., Appellees



On Appeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 06-01-00048-CV



MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 23, 2008, the appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant did not respond to the motion. The brief of the appellant was due on November 30, 2007. The appellant failed to file a brief or a motion for extension of time. There being no satisfactory explanation for the appellant's failure to timely file the brief, the appellees' motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Costs are assessed against appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED.





____________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice



Opinion Delivered February 7, 2008

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑