Honoel Regulo v. State
Honoel Regulo v. State
Opinion
Honoel Regulo was convicted and sentenced on indictments for burglary of a building and delivery of marijuana. Regulo filed notice of appeal on November 8, 2007. The trial court entered certifications of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that these are plea-bargain cases and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court's certifications have been provided to the Court of Appeals by the district clerk.
On December 3, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeals would be dismissed unless amended certifications were filed within fifteen days of the date of the notices and made a part of the appellate records. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1. The records have not been supplemented with amended certifications.
Because certifications that show the defendant has the right of appeal have not been made part of the records, the appeals must be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
APPEALS DISMISSED.
______________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered January 16, 2008
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.