Gabriel Anthony Jimenez v. State
Gabriel Anthony Jimenez v. State
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-07-00056-CR
Gabriel Anthony Jimenez,
Appellant
v.
The State of Texas,
Appellee
From the 361st District Court
Brazos County, Texas
Trial Court No. 06-00382-CRF-361
abatement order
Gabriel Jimenez was charged with two counts of possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance in an amount less than 28 grams. Jimenez filed a motion to suppress which was denied by the trial court. Jimenez was specifically allowed to appeal the ruling on his motion to suppress and was not required to report to the community supervision department until the mandate issued from this Court. As permitted, Jimenez appealed.
Jimenez filed his notice of appeal with the trial court on January 18, 2007. The reporter’s record was due February 19, 2007. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.2. This Court, through the Court Clerk, tried for over seven months to obtain the reporter’s record so that the appeal could proceed. On November 14, 2007, it became necessary for the Court to abate this appeal to the trial court to: 1) conduct a hearing within 21 days from the date of the Order; and (2) prepare and tender to the trial court clerk written findings of fact and conclusions of law and a signed, written order consistent with the Order within 28 days from the date of the Order. The record on the merits was filed in this Court on December 4, 2007. Six days late, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed on December 18, 2007 containing the trial court’s written order from the hearing, dated December 4, 2007.
This appeal was reinstated on December 11, 2007. Jimenez’ brief was due January 10, 2008. No brief was filed. On January 15, 2008, a late brief notice was sent to Jimenez. Two days later, the Court received and filed a motion from Jimenez requesting the abatement of the appeal for findings of fact and conclusions of law. According to Jimenez, the State confirmed that the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law would be forwarded to the trial court “in the near future.” Further, Jimenez contended that the motion was unopposed by the State. We granted the motion to abate. However, more than 30 days have passed since we granted the motion and no findings or conclusions have been provided to us.
This appeal is reinstated and again ordered abated for the trial court to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law within 28 days from the date of this order or prepare a statement that no findings or conclusions are required and that none will be prepared.
A supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law or statement of the trial court must be filed with this Court within 42 days from the date of this hearing.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Vance, and
Justice Reyna
Order issued and filed March 12, 2008
Do not publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.