Jimmy Wayne Cumpian v. Jay Lack
Jimmy Wayne Cumpian v. Jay Lack
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
JIMMY WAYNE CUMPIAN, Appellant,
JAY LACK, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 24, 2008. On October 2, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. No response has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 4th day of December, 2008.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.