Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Diana C. Diaz, D.D.S., P.C. and Diana N. Diaz v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N. A.

Diana C. Diaz, D.D.S., P.C. and Diana N. Diaz v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N. A.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 17, 2008

Diana C. Diaz, D.D.S., P.C. and Diana N. Diaz v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N. A.

Opinion











NUMBER 13-07-00601-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DIANA C. DIAZ, D.D.S, P.C. AND DIANA N. DIAZ, Appellants,



v.



JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, Diana C. Diaz, D.D.S. and Diana N. Diaz, appealed a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On October 2, 2007, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e). See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(e).

The Clerk directed appellants to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of that notice. On January 8, the Clerk notified appellants that the defect had not been corrected and warned appellants that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect were not cured within ten days. To date, the defect has not been corrected, and the deputy clerk and court reporter have further informed this Court that appellants have failed to request and make payment arrangements for the appellate record in this cause. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct these defects, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 17th day of April, 2008.









Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.