Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2008

Graciela S. Robles v. Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg A/K/A Christus Spohn Health System Corporation

Graciela S. Robles v. Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg A/K/A Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 20, 2008

Graciela S. Robles v. Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg A/K/A Christus Spohn Health System Corporation

Opinion











NUMBER 13-07-00695-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

GRACIELA S. ROBLES, Appellant,



v.



CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL KLEBERG A/K/A

CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 105th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Rodriguez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Graciela Robles, pro se, perfected an appeal from a summary judgment rendered against her in favor of appellee, Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg a/k/a Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ("Christus Spohn"). On January 4, 2008, and again on February 4, 2008, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on December 10, 2007, and that the Deputy District Clerk of Kleberg County, Lula Belle Smart, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant failed to respond to the Court's notices. Christus Spohn has now filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and Christus Spohn's motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 20th day of March, 2008.









Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.