Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Contract Fabricating Services v. Robert Mathis

Contract Fabricating Services v. Robert Mathis
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 24, 2009

Contract Fabricating Services v. Robert Mathis

Opinion

Opinion issued September 24, 2009















In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas




NO. 01-09-00536-CV




CONTRACT FABRICATING SERVICES, Appellant



V.



ROBERT MATHIS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-28092




MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Contract Fabricating Services has neither established indigence, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk's record filed due to appellant's fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Contract Fabricating Services did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

Appellant has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §§ 51.207 (Vernon 2005), 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2008); 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2008) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Contract Fabricating Services did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution for failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee and for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.



PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Massengale.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.