State v. Joseph T. Reed
State v. Joseph T. Reed
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-293-CV
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT
V.
JOSEPH T. REED APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered appellant=s AMotion To Dismiss For Mootness.@ It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Smith, No. 02-03-00046-CV, 2003 WL 22071455, at * 1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Aug. 29, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 25, 2009
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.