Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

State v. Joseph T. Reed

State v. Joseph T. Reed
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 25, 2009

State v. Joseph T. Reed

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-293-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT V. JOSEPH T. REED APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ---------- We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss For Mootness.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); State Farm Mut. Auto Ins.

Co. v. Smith, No. 02-03-00046-CV, 2003 WL 22071455, at * 1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 29, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 25, 2009

 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.