Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Bruce J. Cossett A/K/A Francis Cahill v. State

Bruce J. Cossett A/K/A Francis Cahill v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 21, 2009

Bruce J. Cossett A/K/A Francis Cahill v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                               COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

 

 

                                        NO. 2-09-257-CR

 

 

BRUCE J. COSSETT                                                             APPELLANT

A/K/A FRANCIS CAHILL

 

                                                   V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

 

                                              ------------

 

             FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                              ------------


Appellant Bruce J. Cossett a/k/a Francis Cahill was convicted of murder in 1978.  In April 2009, he filed a pro se motion for new trial, claiming that A[n]ewly discovered information has come to light which will conclusively confirm [his] original defense.@  In June 2009, appellant filed a notice of appeal from Athe Order dated sometime within the past 30 days.@  On July 24, 2009, we notified appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court had not entered any appealable orders, and we stated that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal files with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Appellant filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

Because we generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal in a criminal case only when there has been a judgment of conviction, and appellant has not shown grounds for continuing the appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1996, no pet.); Rohr v. State, Nos. 02-09-00004-CR, 02-09-00005-CR, 02-09-00006-CR, 2009 WL 806914, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Mar. 26, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL:  MEIER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  August 21, 2009



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.