Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Daniel L. Foster, D.O. v. Mary Richardson

Daniel L. Foster, D.O. v. Mary Richardson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 20, 2009

Daniel L. Foster, D.O. v. Mary Richardson

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                               COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

 

 

                                        NO. 2-09-216-CV

 

 

DANIEL L. FOSTER, D.O. AND                                             APPELLANTS

ANGELO L. OTERO, M.D.                                                                     

 

                                                   V.

 

MARY RICHARDSON                                                              APPELLEE

 

                                              ------------

 

            FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                              ------------


Appellant Angelo L. Otero, M.D. attempted to appeal from an order denying his motion to dismiss and granting a thirty-day extension to Appellee Mary Richardson to allow her the opportunity to cure deficiencies in her expert report.  On July 27, 2009, we notified the parties that it appeared that this court might lack jurisdiction over Otero=s attempted appeal because the order at issue did not appear to be an appealable interlocutory order.  Our letter also stated that unless Otero or any party desiring to continue Otero=s appeal filed, on or before August 6, 2009, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this attempted appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3; see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. ' 51.014(a)(9) (Vernon 2008) (stating that an appeal may not be taken from an order granting an extension under section 74.351).

On August 6, 2009, Otero filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, agreeing that his interlocutory appeal appeared to be premature and requesting that this court dismiss his pending interlocutory appeal.  We grant his motion, and we dismiss Otero=s appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

This case shall hereafter be styled ADaniel L. Foster, D.O. v. Mary Richardson.@

 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DELIVERED: August 20, 2009



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.