Eric Von Drake v. Paul Meyer and Jerald Kelly
Eric Von Drake v. Paul Meyer and Jerald Kelly
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-119-CV
ERIC VON DRAKE APPELLANT
V.
PAUL MEYER AND JERALD KELLY APPELLEES
----------
FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
On May 15, 2009, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the appellate record in this appeal had informed this court that satisfactory payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the designated clerk=s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution if, on or before June 1, 2009, appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the appellate record.
On May 27, 2009, appellant filed a motion for extension, and on June 10, 2009, appellant=s motion for extension was granted in part and denied in part, giving appellant until June 26, 2009 to provide this court with proof of such payment or payment arrangements, regardless of whether appellant paid or made arrangements to pay the court reporter for the reporter=s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). We have received no proof of payment or payment arrangements.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: July 9, 2009
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.