Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

McClung Roofing, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance, Independent Insurance Group, and Hull and Company General Agency, Inc.

McClung Roofing, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance, Independent Insurance Group, and Hull and Company General Agency, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 2, 2009

McClung Roofing, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance, Independent Insurance Group, and Hull and Company General Agency, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-377-CV

MCCLUNG ROOFING, INC. APPELLANT

V.

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE, INDEPENDENT APPELLEES

INSURANCE GROUP, AND HULL AND

COMPANY GENERAL AGENCY, INC.

----------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.   See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant , for which let execution issue.   See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 2, 2009

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.