Q'So, Inc., Amy Arnoldt, and Fredrick Arnoldt v. Capital One, N.A.
Q'So, Inc., Amy Arnoldt, and Fredrick Arnoldt v. Capital One, N.A.
Q'So, Inc., Amy Arnoldt, and Fredrick Arnoldt v. Capital One, N.A.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-163-CV Q'SO, INC., AMY ARNOLDT, AND APPELLANTS FREDRICK ARNOLDT V. CAPITAL ONE, N.A. APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ---------- We have considered “Appellants’ Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, LIVINGSTON, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 18, 2009
… See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.