Samuel Michael Schildkraut v. Sarah Beshara, Matthew Beshara, and William B. Short, Jr.
Samuel Michael Schildkraut v. Sarah Beshara, Matthew Beshara, and William B. Short, Jr.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-359-CV SAMUEL MICHAEL SCHILDKRAUT APPELLANT V. SARAH BESHARA, MATTHEW BESHARA, APPELLEES AND WILLIAM B. SHORT, JR. ---------- FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ---------- On February 23, 2009, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
… See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J.
DELIVERED: March 19, 2009
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.