Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

City of Richland Hills, Texas v. Ruth E. Haynes and Viola Gelvin

City of Richland Hills, Texas v. Ruth E. Haynes and Viola Gelvin
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 26, 2009

City of Richland Hills, Texas v. Ruth E. Haynes and Viola Gelvin

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-08-438-CV

 

CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS                                         APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

RUTH E. HAYNES AND VIOLA GELVIN                                     APPELLEES

 

                                               ----------

           FROM THE 153RD  DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered the AAgreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted.  Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we vacate the trial court=s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(b), 43.2(f); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).


Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  February 26, 2009



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.