City of Richland Hills, Texas v. Ruth E. Haynes and Viola Gelvin
City of Richland Hills, Texas v. Ruth E. Haynes and Viola Gelvin
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-08-438-CV
CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS APPELLANT
V.
RUTH E. HAYNES AND VIOLA GELVIN APPELLEES
----------
FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered the “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(b), 43.2(f); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson , 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same , for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 26, 2009
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.